Markus Schwarzenberg wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Brian Redfern > <bredfern@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>2.6 on suse is also different than 2.6 fedora, because suse has a >>couple of audio programmers who work to make sure their kernel works >>with audio, so I can use all my audio apps out of the box with 9.2, >>and the 2.6 kernel, without latency problems, and without needing a >>kernel recompile. > > > Suse 9.2 ? I thought they are at 9.1, currently - no hints to 9.2 on > their web site (It's funny, there are some more "suse 9.2" google matches). > > So, apparently suse 9.1 does have an audio friendly kernel? > I believe that Takashi-san works for Suse. He recently posted a paper showing some latency numbers for different distributions. Suse did quite well as I remember. It was my impression that this was not an accident and that he had played a part in making sure this was true. It made me briefly consider trying Suse out... ;-0 - Mark
