"Ben": > > I can't tell you what is causing this but you probably won't get a > noticeable improvement by switching from 48 to 96 kHz. Your speaker > system (and your ears) are probably incapable of resolving >20kHz > signals in a live PA-type situation. Audio professionals ( mixers, > mastering engineers, etc - not manufacturers ) are still undecided > whether higher sampling rates is a good thing. My impression is that the more maths an audio professional knows, the more sure the audio professional is that higher sampling rates is a bad thing. (unless you are recording sounds that is later going to be downsampled a lot of course) Perhaps its impossible for us non-skilled-mathematicians to understand properly why 96 kHz is a bad thing... --
