Florin Andrei wrote: > Anyone here using 192kHz for sampling? > are you trying to record for dogs or bats ? ;) seriously, the only measurably effect of 192k is that it fills up your disks faster and eats more cpu when processing. imnsho, all this sampling rate hype is a clever industry ploy to keep people from thinking that their hardware is finally good enough and they can stop buying now. people can't hear over 20k. period. 48k sampling rate gives you 24k minus what's cropped off by the aliasing filter. granted, higher sampling allows you to use a simpler, less steep aliasing filter, and some people claim to perceive an improvement from that. but even then, 96k should be enough. -- "I never use EQ, never, never, never. I previously used to use mic positioning but I've even given up on that too." - Jezar on http://www.audiomelody.com J?rn Nettingsmeier Kurf?rstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server) http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)
