[linux-audio-user] Which kernel for low latency and kernel 2.6.1-mm# problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:01:19 -0800,
Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > I just wanted to elaborate abit; -R in the argument line indicates that jack 
> > should be running SCHED_FIFO, and since there are no specific settings for 
> > period-size and number of periods, jack is probably defaulting to 2-periods 
> > and 1024 samples period size. 2.4 works rather reliably with period-sizes 
> > quite a bit smaller than that. I think 256 is commonly used, with good 
> > hardware+drivers I suppose you could go even lower.
> 
> I don't know what these numbers mean...
> 
> What does this transalate to in interval-in-milliseconds, and after how
> many milliseconds delay will an underrun occur?
> 
> And what else is happening on the system at the time?

a few months ago before 2.6.0 was released, i tested the audio latency
with different kernels.  the result was shown in the internal
conference in SUSE, and i totally forgot to release the data until now
:)
maybe it will show you other aspects.

here you can find the slides

	http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/audio-latency.pdf

some notes:

  - the red line of the graph is the buffer size - when the plot
    overcomes this line, the buffer underrun occurs, aka sound
    dropout.
  - performed on Athlon 2200+ / 256MB / SB live
  - the kernel tested at that time was slightly old, 2.6.0-test10,
    so the result with the latest kernel may differ.
  - suse 2.4 kernel runs with HZ=1000 and O(1) scheduler

--
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>		ALSA Developer - www.alsa-project.org

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux