torsdagen den 15 januari 2004 17.49 skrev Rocco: > mathias_lundgren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>While were on the subject... I'm courious why none of the built in > >>synths in muse allow for panning? I mean, each soft synth can be panned > >>with the mixer. But *no* individual instruments on *any* of the > >>softsynths can be panned seperatly. It's a shame because the built-in > >>synth called "Fluid" (not "FluidSynth"... just "Fluid") sounds a lot > >>better than FluidSynth *or* timidity. I'd really like to use "Fluid" but > >>just can't see not being able to have control over each instruments > >>volume and planning. I even started up Muse and connected SoundFontCombi > >>(SoftSynth mixer) up to "Fluid" and had no control over the panning of > >>instruments. > > > > Hmmm, I wonder what version you were using. The 'Fluid' softsynth doesn't > > handle panning nor any regular controllers at all IIRC (I wonder if it > > did handle NRPN/RPN:s, perhaps I'm mistaken, there was something strange > > with that). > > See the post I just sent (or maybe you already have by now) Sorry, long ping times.. Dang, it appears as if some of the mails I get are just blank. I'm getting crazy.... > > It's actually possible to load several soundfonts in one > > fluidsynth-instance (then assign different soundfonts to different > > channels). > > That's great, but I'm (currently) in love with one soundfont and it's > 145 Megs in size (and growing as I keep adding to it). :-) Several > versions of that loaded into FluidSynth can really drain the memory :-) Yes, but actually you don't need to do load it for every channel. You can use different instruments from that soundfont on all midi-channels. :-) /Mathias
