Jan Depner wrote: > <snip> So, the bottom line is that 48000 > *may*, in fact, be optimal. Thanks guys, I'll leave it at 48000 then :-) -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk
Jan Depner wrote: > <snip> So, the bottom line is that 48000 > *may*, in fact, be optimal. Thanks guys, I'll leave it at 48000 then :-) -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk