R Parker wrote: > Hi, > > --- Joern Nettingsmeier > <nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>davidrclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>>Greetings Linux Audio Users. >>> >> >>it might also be interesting for the jamin >>developers to take a look at >>this. > > > WARNING: I am going to over react to Joern's > reasonable suggestion because JAMin has recently > included another feature that I strongly argued > against. So, please have patience with me. I don't > have a life and I'm a loser. :) here's ron parker, back on his neverending quest for simplicity and correctness(tm) :-D you are right, jamin is fine as it is and should not be bloated with features. (btw, i do agree with you in that i don't really see the point of balance controls per band). *however*: having a little pop-up window "correct for headphone listening" with a bunch of tweakables can't hurt :) (runs) but then, i was not seriously requesting that feature, i just meant david's software is interesting food for thought in the context of mastering, and if one day it becomes a LADSPA plug, the whole point is moot and folks can plug it any old place in their audio chain. > JAMin is a very good tool. For the most part, it is > not the result of an experiment. It is a well thought > out design of typical and expected tools for the > specific task of mastering stereo audio files. It is a > very clean, easy to use and unbloated application that > is being used in real world installations. This makes > it very different from something like ecamegapedal or > any other effect where experimentation is the rule for > producing awesome and unexpected results. very interesting pov. i completely agree. if the jamin folks do, too, this should be put on their website as a design guideline. best, j?rn -- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics! - Homer Simpson J?rn Nettingsmeier Kurf?rstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server) http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)
