> >>>>> "Jack" == Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> writes: > Jack> All the complaints I've seen about LSM were rather vague, > Jack> and mostly seem motivated by discontent that someone else's > Jack> security hooks got introduced into the mainline kernel. The > Jack> current hooks are quite adequate for my simple needs. Hasse Hagen Johansen <hhj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But I don't think the arguments a vague...http://rsbac.org/lsm.htm That's the complaint I was talking about. Those nine "issues" are more matters of style than substance. To my ears it comes across as a rant about the fact that Linus accepted NSA's framework into the base kernel and not his. But, I don't know all the history behind it. Maybe he had a valid beef. To me, that is all moot. I need to work with what's available, which is the SELinux framework. Actually, it's a lot better than I had feared when first looking into the matter. -- joq
