On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 05:56:59 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 17:19, Steve Harris wrote: > > > Its the EQ + xover processing thats taking all the CPU. > > Have you considered the possibility of a more standard EQ, maybe 5 bands > that are highly programmable? A linear phase implementation with freq, > gain, Q, HP/LP/BP/shelf as a starting point. Would that save much in CPU > cycles? It would be fairly easy to do a 5 band paramtric (not linear phase though), but it would change the UI a lot. > The 32 band EQ you all have done is very easy to use, and the little bit > I've done with it sounds good, but it's just my feeling that by the time > I get to the mastering steps I'm not going to do so much tweaking that I > need that amount of flexibility. It's more work to use fewer controls, > like on my Waves Masters Bundle, but it helps me not not get tempted to > play around too much. Thats why theres paramtric like peak controls in Jan HDEQ - you you can just grab peaks and slide them about if you dont want that much control. - Steve
