Florin Andrei wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 14:05, Kent, Gary wrote: ... >> I am trying out fvwm and it is pretty sparse, but was wondering >>what others might suggest as best for audio? > > > FVWM is kinda too sparse for my taste :-) > > FluxBox is pretty good. Very small, not as rigid as FVWM, very fast, not sparse? rigid? these words do not describe fvwm at all. it's has pretty much all the features a WM can have and it's also one of the most configurable ones. erik
