Pete Bessman <ninjadroid@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> RTaylor wrote:
> > My real problem would be with the squeaky bits that you've got
> > going along with the massive guitar thrummy stuff. They just don't
> > seem to be part of the same song. I like the massive guitar thrummy
> > stuff... the other sounds throw me off. Maybe if you were to morph
> > between the two somehow or toss in a transitional sound?
>
> That's a good premise on which to do a remix, but it would actually be
> a bit too drastic of a change to make and still consider the song to
> be the same. The dynamics of this song are intentionally raw and
> dichotomous.
:} Alright. Just a suggestion. {Too much time spent in crits. I just assume
that when someone put something up that they want that sort of response.
I do hope you don't take offense at that sort of thing. {Strangely enough...
most folks response in crits is pretty similar to your own. As mine usually
is. If something's done enough to show... I'm usually so tired of it that I
never want to see it again.}}
> As always, if you want to hack it up, have at it! And I can guarantee
No thanks. I'm still not quite sure I agree with the concept of remixing. Most
of my samples began life as white noise or generated tones or feedback. I do
have some storebought stuff but that's been splattered against the side of the
soundcard enough times that it bears *absolutely* no resemblance to the
original. Not that I would actually care about the logistics of using it... It
just doesn't interest me.
> you that I'll release something that is almost exclusively massive
> guitar, since I'm a guitarist first and foremost.
Gotta love guitar stuff.
--
Though your brother's bound and gagged and they've chained him to a chair.
Won't you please come to Chicago just to sing. In a land that's known as freedom
how can such a thing be fair. Won't you please come to Chicago for the help that
we can bring. {Graham Nash}
