Hallo, Matthew Allen hat gesagt: // Matthew Allen wrote: > Ahh, funny you should ask this. I have been experimenting with > both Fluxbox (http://www.fluxbox.org) and FVWM (http://www.fvwm.org) > under CCRMA (fedora). I originally went with fluxbox but, at least for > me, it actually had to much extra stuff (slit, tabs, icon bar). I really > only needed a root menu, hotkeys and a pager, after a bunch of looking > around I ended up with FVWM. Its learning curve is a bit daunting (this > is linux isn't it?) but that is sort of mitigated by 2 things: The sheer > amount of stuff you could do with it if you wanted, and the FVWM-themes > project (http://fvwm-themes.sourceforge.net) Judging by file size, fluxbox is rather bloated, but blackbox comes out smallest - not counting the anorectic window managers like swm or failsafewm (ouch!) from www.small-window-manager.de: -rwxrwxr-x 1 freak freak 7404 Feb 18 23:58 failsafewm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 257472 Apr 14 2003 /usr/bin/blackbox -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359160 Mar 23 2003 /usr/bin/fvwm2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 406668 Mar 13 2003 /usr/bin/icewm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 625828 Jan 27 2003 /usr/bin/fluxbox Personally I run blackbox. I tried fluxbox as well, but found, that I don't use any of the features in fluxbox, that aren't in blackbox as well, so I went back to black. My KDE/Gnome is the minibar: http://www.phed.org/miniProject/ Source apparently gone, mirrored at http://footils.org/pkg/minifbar-0.06.tgz ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
