Hi. I've read the stuff on the LAD website about the two low-latency patch options for the 2.4 kernels -- Robert Love's preempt patch and Andrew Morton's low-latency patch. Each are described as having good and bad points in comparison. The way in which it's discussed seems to suggest that one should choose one or the other; nowhere is discussed whether it's a good or bad idea to apply both. But that seems to be possible; the Debian package page for AM's low-latency kernel patch indicates that it's compatible with the preempt patch. So I guess I'm looking for advice about this. Are they indeed compatible? Is there some reason why applying *both* would be a bad thing? Thanks for any info. -c -- Chris Metzler cmetzler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20040213/58da233d/attachment.bin
