On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:02:37 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Steve Harris hat gesagt: // Steve Harris wrote: > > > RDF servers tend to be databases underneath anyway (mines built on mysql) > > for speed and persistence reasons. You might be confusing RSS and RDF, RSS > > uses one RDF schema (and quite a popular one) but you generally use others > > in addition for domain specific things (like application and person > > metadata in this case). > > Ah, yes: I was indeed confusing RDF and RSS. Well, let's just > implement both. ;) Heh, yes :) I think an RSS feed is pretty much essential, but wether we use RDF for the storage as well depends on the implementor. I knocking up a quick RDF version of Daves site to show what the data would look like. - Steve
