On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:52, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:21 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 15:10, Lee Revell wrote: > > > I tried JACK today with vanilla 2.6.10 and had excellent reaults - it > > > works with 32 and 64 frames, which previously required Ingo's patches. > > > Many of the latency fixes have been going upstream, and it looks like we > > > are finally showing some results. I think we may finally have a kernel > > > that's usable out of the box for low latency audio. > > > > > > Can someone else try to verify these results? > > > > I'll try to asap. A Planet CCRMA fellow dweller just posted some very > > rough comparison tests between several kernels and 2.6.10 was doing > > quite well. The 0.7.33-04 DESKTOP_PREEMPT was doing much better but was > > also less stable (but he was testing it with extremely low buffer > > sizes). > > This was on the CCRMA list? Got a URL? http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2004-December/007341.html http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2004-December/007343.html -- Fernando
