On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:48 PM Peter P. <peterparker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2021-11-09 19:18]: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:41 AM Peter P. <peterparker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Paul, indeed I am using JACK1. Largely because I remember > > > having had some problems / incompatibilities with JACK2 in the past. > > > > Then this is one of the "costs" of using JACK1 (and was one of the > > major motivations for JACK2) > > Do you see any advantages of JACK1 still? Thanks! Well for me personally the fact that I wrote (a lot of) it seems sort of important :) The integration of a2jmidid is probably one the better features of JACK1 over JACK2. The integration of zita_a2j/j2a is also a big plus but alas, I did not keep it up to date with Fons' own code, and the version inside JACK1 is markedly inferior. As a result I'm still running zita_a2j despite the possibility of using the integrated version. JACK1 is just "more right" than JACK2, but JACK2 has features that lots of people think they want: integration with dBus, parallelism when the data flow permits it. click-free connections. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
