[linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
From: RickTaylor at Speakeasy.Net (Rick Taylor)
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:53:09 2004
In-reply-to: <1103510209.19839.28.camel@Gentoo>
References: <1101345220.26762.14.camel@Gentoo> <200412190611.54632.RickTaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1103510209.19839.28.camel@Gentoo>

On Sunday 19 December 2004 08:36 pm, you wrote:

> Forget it.

Convincing?
-- 
www.RTaylor-Design.Com

References:
- [linux-audio-user] RME is no more
  - From: Marek Peteraj
- [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
  - From: Rick Taylor
- [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
  - From: Marek Peteraj

Prev by Date: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
Next by Date: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread
Previous by thread: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
Next by thread: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux