Hi. This sparked my interest, as I have missed that CM has gained RT capabilities. As a non-GUI person, I played with Csound (early 90s), CM (around 2000) and SC (from 2003 onwards). Would you mind giving a short comparison of cm-incudine compared to SC? Or, if you have no SC experience, could you highlight what you particularily like about cm-incudine? I ask because I speak Lisp fluently, so CM is still an interesting option for me. I just left it behind since SC offered a much more interesting RT experience, and the custom language feels pretty concise. The last point is probably a strength and a weakness. sclang is a nice language, but it is also unique, which means almost no library reuse from other coders not involved in sound synthesis. BTW, there is also cl-collider, which I recently discovered any played with a little. I guess that is the main reason why I find it interesting to re-evaluate CM. Brandon Hale <bthaleproductions@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hello all, > > Have you ever wanted to use cm-incudine, but felt like it was too hard > or too much work to install on your Arch Linux-based distro? Now you > can install it with > https://github.com/brandflake11/install-cm-incudine > <https://github.com/brandflake11/install-cm-incudine>. This script > will take you from zero to hero, installing emacs, slime, quicklisp, > and all of the dependencies needed for cm-incudine. > > Hopefully this helps you install cm-incudine if you've ever been > interested, but couldn't figure out all of the smaller bits. Feedback > is welcome! > > Thank you very much for your time, > > Brandon Hale > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
