[...] > >but like OSC, it has no semantics at all, and unlike OSC, "zero syntax". > >that means that the semantics are defined by the patching, and nothing > >else. This is not possible for digital signals., because at the very least > >they all have syntax, and most of them have semantics too. > > From my point of view, the greatest weakness of OSC is that (as far as I can > tell) it has no default set of common controls, so everything has to start > from scratch - both ends. [...] This brings up a question: Since OSC is a synthax format nothing more, there have been a list of implementation on the http://opensoundcontrol.org/ somewhere like TUIO [1], ... now sadly gone. So mostly I looked at those to see if I have to invent my own Protocol using OSC and it is not findable for me. Is there any compilation of OSC Protocols like TUIO or for Mixer... ? This would be helpful. mfg winfried [1] https://www.tuio.org/?specification -- - ao.Univ.Prof. DI Winfried Ritsch - ritsch@xxxxxx - http://iem.at/ritsch - Institut fuer Elektronische Musik und Akustik - University of Music and Dramatic Art Graz - Tel. ++43-316-389-3510 (3170) Fax ++43-316-389-3171 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
