In data lunedì 22 febbraio 2021 19:37:19 CET, Paul Davis ha scritto: > Quick take: I think it's really only your insistence on using laptops that > forces most of this complexity on you. > > Get a powerful desktop system. Run everything on one machine. As a matter of fact I *am* using a powerful desktop system: it’s a Ryzen 5 2600X, 16 GB RAM, dual screen, NVMe SSD; the laptop serves as an additional virtual instruments host and as a video monitor (with xjadeo). Sure, Seymour Cray would tell us that two oxen are more appropriate than 1024 chicken at plowing a field, but in this case I prefer to think more in terms of an orchestra: if I can distribute the load among many players and coordinate them, our symphony would be much better than with a one man band... The real objection to my argument is if the benefit in terms of productivity really outweighs the increased maintenance complexity of a multi-machine setup. It depends. If we were to record a live band, apply effects, mixing and mastering, we could manage easily with one machine with enough CPU, RAM and disk space, as well as a decent audio interface. But with different use cases that rely heavily on multiple s/w interacting, the “monolithic” approach is not as acceptable. If you prefer, it does not scale well. Or, at least, this is what my little experience tells me. Besides, there is still another issue: many widely used s/w tools run only on Windows or Mac, and for some of them using Wine on Linux is not an option. We still could use them if we used a dedicated machine and set up the communication with our Linux Workstation running Ardour, Qtractor, or whatever. ciao Francesco Napoleoni _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
