Re: Discussion: Future CPU-technology vs. realtime audio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/27/21 8:41 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, david wrote:

Intel doesn't run at top speed "forever". Fastest clock I've got from my nominal 5GHz-max i9 in my Dell XPS 15 is 4.7GHz. Intel runs clock speed until thermals say "Slow down." If you're talking about a laptop, the

Yes heat is the limit. My (older now) i5 will run at rated speed forever and in fact can run at .2Ghz over that without triggering heat throttling.

Heat *dissipation* is the limit. Laptops are very poor at heat dissipation. An over-packed compact desk case can have problems. One benefit to the old-school full height case. ;)
specific laptop's ability to dissipate heat is the controlling factor. I'm not sure that Intel thermal control is anywhere within reach of BIOS and OS software.

I would tend to agree with the engineering, but it is possible to set the top speed below rated if heat dissapation is not up to full speed. My steady state device temperature while building Ardour lets me know when I need to clean the dust out... after about 10min of all cores at 100% the temperature reaches a top temperature and sits there with no speed drop. If I have boost turned on the speed seems to sit .2 Ghz higher.

The only way my i9 will hit 5GHz, according to Intel specs, is if it's only using 1 core.
From helping people trouble shoot newer HW than mine, it seems newer HW (firmware?) does a better job handing out irqs with none of them being doubled up. However, it seems harder to prioritize a USB device above other USB devices... maybe it matters less for some systems.

Could be, I don't know. Particularly when you start mixing USB1, USB2, USB3, USB3.2/USB-C into things.
I got an older firewire device this past year (Audiofire 12) and while use under the new ALSA fw modules has been poor (256 frame size minimum), Used with the ffado modules... it seems to shine better than anything I have seen... it is true that at 16/2 (I thought it needed /3 but /2 works) the DSP is up at 25% with just jack running (with pulse bridging), there are no xruns unless runninig for days when there may be one xrun. This is better than my old ice1712 PCI card which can also run at 16/2 but not without the odd xrun. USB? I don't have a "good" USB device... but I have not heard great things about even the best of them. (my $1 USB 1.1 audio devices will not run below 64/2 without locking jack up)

My USB device runs at 64/3. I didn't have any JACK lockups at 64/2, but got lots of xruns.
The audio community lost out with the "everything is USB" systems of today. I can't afford to try the PCIe cards from AudioScience or the like to compare. I hope the next gen is better.
I agree with that. I only hope the USB-C/3.2 doesn't mean a barrage of proprietary drivers.

--
David W. Jones
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
"My password is the last 8 digits of π."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux