On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:43 , Christian Frisson <theremin@xxxxxxx> sent: >Re-, > >I hope you didn't take my words as a raw piece of judgement. I just don't get >all the read-between-the-lines of the GPL license, because I've only browsed it >so far, not read carefully. So will you / are you compelled, under the GPL >terms, to make the source code of your distro available, for even those who >haven't bought a license, for example on a server, instead of bundled on the >recorded medium? (I'm quite happy with Fedora Core 1 / Planet CCRMA, I'm not >searching for a free sneak!) > >For my future experiments, what if I want my piece of software to be released >opensource, but I don't want other people to make dirty money (all that's >remaining after sales, packaging, shipment and survival expenses) out of it: >which license should I choose? Say that this piece of software is to be >considered as a third-party of hardware devices, and I want anyone but >concurrent firms stealing that work to be happy with it! I'm on my last year of >engineering degree, nearly the time to switch to the real world! I like the >Neuros (http://open.neurosaudio.com/\) way, schematics and software made public; >but I don't want to be crooked, as I have to make my living too! > I have to say (as I sit here and listen to tunes on my new Neuros player) I really like the Neuros way too. This thing is really nice. I'm planning on recording one of my band practices live tonight (stereo) using the Neuros and a little two channel Behringer mixer. Jan >Cheers,
