On 16 Dec 2004 00:06:08 +0100, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > RME has some interesting information on its page <ALMOST TOTAL SNIP> > > Cheers, > Andreas > Removing consortium@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as I don't know what it is. These are some good links. Great actually. I know of the Bridge Co. chips, as well as some of what Phillips, Sony, Yamaha and others do in this area. I hadn't seen the TC chip. It looks quite cool. I would suggest people think about what they *want* to accomplish with a project like this, and then look at what role, if any, chips like this would play. In my mind I could create a WONDERFUL sound card using the Bridge Co. or TC chips, along with a couple of line drivers, D/A's ect.. This would work and would likely work very well. However, there is nothing 'Open Source' about the hardware design. The board design & layout could be open, but as we've discussed already this group cannot achieve the economy of scale that a real board manufacturer would reach and thus our boards will always be more expensive. Why would any of us by the card from this group for $350 when you could by it from M-Audio for $199? I don't think makes sense. I wouldn't. (Correct me if you think this won't be the case.) In my mind the real 'Open Source Sound Card' (OSSC?) is one where we control the architecture of the hardware and what that hardware is capable of doing. That is where we add value. (Assuming we have value to add!) ;-) I do not think we add value duplicating a demo board program designed at Bridge CO. or TC. That's what the folks in Taiwan do and that's what gets marketed through M-Audio and others. Just my thoughts. Thanks, Mark
