On 12/11/19 11:20, Louigi Verona wrote:
I meant DSP quality.
It would be interesting, if this is actually discussed, if outcomes
could be shared on LAU ML. In particular also what the metrics for
assessment/comparison were/are
Lorenzo.
Louigi Verona
https://louigiverona.com/
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:08 AM Daniel Swärd <excds@xxxxxx
<mailto:excds@xxxxxx>> wrote:
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 10:09 +0100, Hermann Meyer wrote:
> Am 12.11.19 um 09:52 schrieb Daniel Swärd:
> > I on the other hand was wondering if there's a Linux VST for
> > convolution reverb so we could test out the Teufelsberg impulse
> > responses in the soundlab:
> >
> >
http://www.balancemastering.com/blog/free-teufelsberg-nsa-listening-tower-impulse-responses-ir-irs-convolution/
> >
> > /Daniel
>
>
> There is a convolution reverb in the LSP bundle, available as LV2 and
> VST.
Ah, nice. Then I'll have to check that out tonight. :-)
Thanks.
/Daniel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
