Fons Adriaensen-3 wrote > Both are way too high. Are you sure you are measuring > latency, and not just the delay of your filter ? > > A symmetric FIR of 8192 samples would have a delay > of 4096 samples, or 85.333 ms... > > To measure latency, you'd need a 'filter' consisting > of single sample at position 0 (use the 'dirac' command > in the jconvolver config). I am sorry yes I think I have confused the terms being used. I sent an impulse through JConvolver with the oscilloscope CH1 being connected to the signal generators Jack output. CH2 was connected to the Jack Output of Jconvolver. I measeured the time difference on the scope between the two impulses. So I guess I am measuring jack latency and the filter delay. I thought with partitioned convolution the filter delay would be lowered from the traditional delay(85mS)? Thanks for your help with this, my speakers sound so much better since going active and linear phase! Alex -- Sent from: http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/linux-audio-user-f5.html _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
