Analysing (debugging) USB port performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi LAU,

I have anecdotally, but recurrently observed on laptops - including a rather recent one - that there is always a 'best' USB port for external sound cards.

For instance, on my latest machine with a decent 'realtime audio' configuration/set-up (real-time kernel, /etc/limits stuff, 'performance' CPU governor, (wireless) network switched off), I'm able to have a pleasant xrun-free session recording in Ardour including a bunch of tracks with effects playing at 64 frames and period of 3 with a relatively cheap card (UMC202) on one of the USB ports. On the other hand, in the exact same conditions I get incidental xruns at even 128 frames and xrun instability at 64 frames on the other USB ports.

I wonder:

1. Is there a more scientific (well, precise at least) method to assess this USB port performance? What to test or look into? 2. Is there a way to change (e.g. improve the not-so-good USB port performance) OS/software wise, or is this usually hard-wired in notebooks? 2a. Are IRQs relevant on laptops and if so can a whole USB port (or the device attached to it) be optimised from the OS?

Of course I _can_ live with one 'good sound-card port' on a laptop but I'm quite curious about people's experiences and the gurus' wisdom - albeit on my former machine this was the left-side port which was closer to where the sound-card usually sits, now it's on the right, too bad! :)

Hopefully other LAU have mused about such USB-related mysteries in the past...

Lorenzo.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux