Re: Can netjack1/2 over a direct ethernet connection substitute for local ALSA audio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Although I may not use jack servers, I want to address a few concerns.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:46 AM Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This means you desktop
relies on your Pi for a solid sync... if you are usng your desktop audio
for anything important that requires solid sync, I would use the local
device as backend and use zita-njbridge to join the two jack servers on
the two machines.

I don't know what you mean by solid sync. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AptX#aptX_Low_Latency
40ms latency seems to be the threshold beyond which humans detect synchronization issues when they watch videos.
 
No problem (no skype either, but you may not need it) Lots of people use a
jack to alsa bridge

The new skype client can use either ALSA, JACK, or pulseaudio.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux