I have used Mint in the past for audio (as well as other things). Although I am not currently using it I did quite like it at the time.
For editing, sequencing, drum programming and the like in-the-box I think you will fine. JACK, Ardour, Luppp and Hydrogen worked fine for me when I was on Mint, so far as I remember.
But you also say "recording." If that means serious overdubbing or anything else where monitoring and minimal latency are a really big deal you may want a distribution that is specifically set up for low latency. My computer music does not involve this so I can not be more specific. I only know latency is critical in some recording situations. "Desktop" distributions like Mint are not configured with this in mind.
If you need super-low latency and want to use Mint it may take extra tweaking. Again, I do not know the details. If you want low latency pre-configured you might consider an audio-specific distribution.
On the other hand, if you are like me and your work is not effected by the round-trip time out of the box and back in, go with Mint. It is a very pretty, easy to install, nicely packaged, general-purpose, DEB-based desktop distribution that supports all the best desktop environments. At least, it was three years ago, which is probably the last time I used it.
Neil
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, February 15, 2019 1:22 AM, Alf Haakon Pietruszka Lund <alf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all,I'm considering to test Linux mint for my 'sound machine' - a normal laptop that's used for modest recording and editing of sounds and music, as well as miscellaneous office work.Anyone here try that before? Any pitfalls to avoid?Regards, Alf
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
