Re: for sale: "vintage" RME interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul, interesting path, and I have two questions.

1 Why did you choose Motu usb over Fireface usb class compliant ? It may of course be just a matter of cost.

2 Did you experienced any issues with the Motu AVB as reported here ? :

https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18046

(don't read the whole thread, just the last pages)


This said, on my side, I reused a RME DIGI96/8 PAD as reported here :

https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18210


Cheers

Bernard


Le 14/12/2018 à 14:04, Paul Davis a écrit :


On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:51 AM Michael Jarosch <riotsound@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another question is: What device replaced the 9652?

for me personally? my soundcard journey:

     Turtle Beach Tropez+ (I wrote the driver)
     Hoontech something or other (the last interface to do multi-open in hardware - 16 or 32 subdevices!)
     RME Hammerfall 9652 (I rewrote the driver, thanks Winfried)
     RME Digiface
     RME HDSP 9652
           .... RME Fireface 400 (used on a Mac Mini)
     MOTU Ultralite AVB

I'd rather be using RME+PCI still, but the form factor of computers I use now (mini-ATX etc) doesn't allow it. The MOTU is a solid device, and nearly as flexible as the *amazing* fireface 400, but MOTU+USB is never going to warm my heart in the same way as the various RME devices did.


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux