Le Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:29:45 -0400, jonetsu <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:25:04 +0200 > Daniel Swärd <excds@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 07:36 -0400, jonetsu wrote: > > > And I got pages full of links to many Reda articles, including the > > > one she proclaims was blocked. > > > > > > Maybe I did something wrong. > > > > No, you didn't do anything wrong. It was blocked previously, but it > > got fixed. > > > > The whole point was the irony of an article about automated > > censorship machines got blocked by such a machine... > > It's not a good test at all I find. Why would someone input the full > URL in a text search box as a test ? Is that supposed to mimic the > public access to information ? No. Very, very strange way of proving > any point at all. The lady might have good arguments, I haven't read, > but this test is very much on the lame side of things I find. Why > would someone with solid arguments do such a test ? Maybe because she is some geek using some well know open source OS with so many different tool-kits than when she's clicking on an url, she never knows what will append. > > It does not represent public access to information at all. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user -- If you have a problem and you are not doing anything to fix it, you are at the heart of the problem. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
