On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:51:22 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 18:05:49 -0400, jonetsu wrote: > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYngev6RB_U > I fight against a tinnitus by a cortisone treatment to get rid of such > noise. Are there people out there who enjoy listening to this kind of > sound? This is the disgusting kind of sound used for boring > documentations, done by young people, who only just finished film > academy and started working for television. It wouldn't be surprising that it's also used by dictatorial regimes and the CIA, showing commonalities in application. > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiLdYLklS0U > > This is nice music :), however it could be done with non-modular > synth, too. Maybe the arrangement of sounds and modulations in this piece might have been facilitated by all of them happening at the same time using a unified interface. A bit perhaps like having 5 non-modular synths with a set of modulation-capable macros addressing several parameters on each. One thing with non-modular synths is that they would offer a much, much wider range of sounds. So the idea then would be to provide a unified modulation interface that can work with several non-modular synths while these synths themselves would be driven by a sequencer that also can be finely modulated. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
