Nov 30 2017, Peter has written:
Dear Jeanette, as David pointed as, as long as you don't need a low latency for monitoring or real-time effects, there's no reason against a larger buffer.
I just tried a JACK period size of 1024, with the result of no xruns, but also much too much latency. Since I have to monitor everything through my soundcard and also receive guidance from previously recorded tracks that will sadly be not a feasible solution. ...
of 0.1s wouldn't hurt if it is sufficient to look at the meters simultaneously
Ah and there would be an additional snag. :) But for mixing a higher delay is not a problem at all. Due to my recording environment and the fact that I do studio work only, I do not work very "live". ... -------- * website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound * SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c With you I get so high Lost in the crystal sky You are this melody That's where you take me <3 (Britney Spears) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
