On November 16, 2017 10:44:42 AM HST, David Santamauro <david.santamauro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 11/16/2017 01:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > IMO Ardours user interface is completely ignoring the way most > creative > > people think, at least when being creative. It's possible for > everybody > > Ok, I'll bite (although every time I respond to you I feel like I'm > being trolled): How in the world can you drop a blanket statement > assuming to understand how "most" creative people think, or what they > like, or how they manage their work flow, or how they'll view a gif of > a > dancing something or another ... or what their preferred whatever is > ...? -- the answer is: you can't. > > Unless you have done some serious polling of a large enough set of > people who have some sort of proven creativity, what you say above is > complete horse shit. If by chance you have conducted such a poll, > please > show the results from the question: "While in the throes of > creativity, > does Ardour's user interface completely ignore how you think?" Well, when I made an attempt to use Ardour, I quickly figured out that its design assumed I was a fluent user of a traditional hardware mixer and an experienced sound tech/engineer ... but I'm no music pro, so could just be me. At the same time, I handled the physical tasks of connecting cables between modules on a Moog ages ago, so maybe Ardour needs a more physical UI? ;) -- David W. Jones gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community http://dancingtreefrog.com Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
