On Aug 29, 2017 03:39, "Peter P." <peterparker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * list <list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2017-08-29 15:25]: > > apt-daily.timer loaded active waiting Daily apt download activities > Which you can disable safely. > > > > and > > > > remote-fs.target loaded active active Remote File Systems > Can be disabled as well I think. > > > Not sure they are vital. But i see nothing about them on the journalctl > > that matches the time of the XRUN - the apt-daily time occurs like 1 > > time every 8 hours or so. > Did you look at jackd priorities? > > > The Card(s) are alone on they interrupt line - already manage that - > > thank linux audio wiki & others, well explained and documented, and > > still up to date. > > > > > > Thank you again for reading you all ! Appreciate that a lot ! > > > > > > ps : I think it was a wrong routed message from David. J but i do not > > want a RT Kernel (do i really need one ?!) for my simple recording > > needs. A good low latency, well configured Kernel should do the trick. > As far as I understand, if I may chime in, the -rt kernel from the > Debian packages does implement several realtime patches, but not all of > them and is not a completely hard realtime kernel. You should at least > install one in parallel to your existing kernel and give it a try to > rule this possibility out and not lose time over speculations. I think there is some disagreement over whether hard RT is needed for audio work. I think hard RT is meant more for systems running manufacturing hardware. My systems work just fine for audio work using Debian's and KXStudio's -rt kernels. Is KXStudio's kernel hard RT or low-latency? David W. Jones gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community http://dancingtreefrog.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
