Re: [Slightly OT]: small studio tour with photos online

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 May 2017, Jeanette C. wrote:

May 1 2017, Ralf Mardorf has written:
...
resp. the missing
mixing console is a little bit unique,
...
I have a feeling that most people recommend a mixing desk, but going
directy into the computer is very convenient and saves space. :) Yea, I
do lack a nice hardware channel strip, but a nice one would cost me. :)

I have a mixer in my "Studio". Really, it comes from days gone by when I had a Fostex R8 tape machine. I still use it for the mic preamps (though they are not up to my ribbon mic) and monitoring. I would be better off with buying new preamps as I need them... I have one stereo pre now and for most of my work that is double what I need. It may be nice to have lots of inputs and never have to change wiring, but more inputs to the computer means more work for the computer to do that could be used for doing other things. For this use (mostly high-ish level signals in) and monitoring computer plus one input at a time... the Audio interface's mixer is as much as needed.

I would say this studio is a good study in putting money to good use. Only buying what is needed to get the job done. How many other studios (even keyboard based like this) can say they have a clav?

If I was starting over... a mixer would be much farther down the list.


--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux