On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:29:53 +0100 Georg Krause <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +1 for the bfc2k. > > > but it's a Behringer... > > It is. But in this case its not a big point, because there are no audio > quality issues or something like that. the midi signal has the same > quality, no matter where you save money. more important is: its class > compliant usb, its fully programmable, pretty robust (i dont have a > case, just put it in a bag to move it) and you can open it and adjust > the fader resistance ;) > > the size may be a down side, but i can totally recommend it. This actually looks very attractive indeed. I found an old Sound On Sound review of it and apparently you can get a Java application for programming it. This is platform agnostic. I think I'd be taking rather a risk trying to order one before Christmas now, but I'll certainly be giving it serious consideration in January. Thanks for such a quick response guys. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
