On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:59:27 +0100, Kjetil Matheussen wrote: >> The English Wiki disagrees with your claim that w64 files are limited >> to 2.1G(B, the Wiki likely mean GiB, the OP perhaps GB), even wav >> seems not to be limited to 2.1G(B|GiB). > >I did not claim either of this. The OP claims that no files larger than 2.1G were produced when using libsndfile. On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:05:24 +0100, you claimed: >libsndfile is not the limiting factor. It's the wav format that doesn't >support large files. In the context your claim actually is, that the wav formats are the culprit. Regarding the Wiki, for what the OP wants to get, the limitation is not caused by the two wav formats. However, it doesn't matter what you wanted to point out, important only is that, if neither libsndfile, nor wav does cause the issue the OP experienced, then something else most cause the trouble. Right? Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
