Re: RT kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i'm just wondering why you'd bother to set HZ when the preferred configuration is NO_HZ .. ?

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:24 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
 >
 >
 > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@xxxxxxxxx
 > <mailto:rncbc@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
 >
 >        echo "CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y" >> .config
 >        echo "CONFIG_HZ_1000=y" >> .config
 >
 > surely a tickless kernel is much better on almost any vaguely modern
 > hardware?
 >

none of the above abstains you from a tickless kernel

CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE are untouched, as far as `make
oldconfig` goes

cheers
--
rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux