On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:17:16 -0400 Robert Edge <thumbknucklerocks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Harrison has been mostly in the business of making digital consoles > for a couple decades now. They are also making software products since quite a few years. > The previous product with the Mixbus name used the EQ, dynamics, and > tape saturation algorithms from those consoles, thus literally > providing the same channel strip. Not an emulation, the same thing. > At least that is what Harrison claimed. If the hardware is not there, then it is not the same thing. Cannot be, even if the emulation is 100% accurate, it is not hardware. Maybe very close, though. Mixbus 32C continues by adding the 32C EQ aspect. > So yes, the distinction matters. Hence, the subject line part that states up front: "Mixbus 32C (based on Ardour)" Although hmmmm.... It could be that the Harrison Mixbus 32C product is only found embedded in their new hardware consoles and that one would have to buy the hardware console to get Mixbus 32C. Then the comparison would be a software product, Reaper, versus an embedded software product only found within hardware consoles. Wouldn't be a fair comparison, wouldn't it. Not fair for Reaper. Not fair for the guys ending up liking Mixbus 32C and having to spend around $50,000 or more and Reaper is not so much at all by a far cry. In short, it is well stated as it is. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
