On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:27:07 +0200, Joël Krähemann wrote: >If you want to do sound analyses you definitely need an effect chain >and the ability to clone the audio data in order getting multiple >results. Hi Joël, this is in reply to what of my statements? The question is to what degree and for what purpose plugins should be able to share data. A given example mentions an audio track, an audio analysis recognises that it is an vocal track and not a guitar track, in case the audio engineer should be unable to distinguish a vocal track from a guitar track and after the analysis is done, useful tools are automatically added to the effect chain, with useful settings, I guess the analysis tool will send data for useful settings to the plugins, that is what the network is required for. For a vocal track e.g. the very useful exciter gets added with some useful settings that fit to the track and an EQ with some useful settings and two compressors with useful settings, too. This is absurd! Let alone that nobody often would use an exciter, useful settings are related to so many things, that an analysis of a track does lead to nothing useful at all. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
