On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:20:00 +0100 Will Godfrey <willgodfrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another very enjoyable track. Thanks for sharing. Thanks. Thanks also to Ffanci and Harry, and everyone who listened or will do. If I my take the opportunity to comment on the piece and specifically on the structure. Since this is an improvisation, a jam of sorts, the initial jest, the bass part, changed tonality spontaneously, without counting anything, and then switched back, switched again and very shortly went back. All without any counts. At that point, before adding other improvisations on top of that I could have straightened up that part. Determine a precise number of times to switch back and forth then redo the track. Instead I left it as is, which created some problems as other tracks were added because it took time before fitting in that unpredictable change of events. So I resorted to simple flow with it by feeling instead of counts. Or instead of the expectation of a so well-known familiar number of counts. This impromptu switch of tonality turned out, IMHO, to give the result a certain charm. Especially for a piece made entirely from synths and a steady rhythm track. There's another one from a few months ago that also went about the same way, jam6 (although not electronica). Cheers. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
