On Wednesday 25 August 2004 01:56 pm, Paul Winkler wrote: > Correcting myself: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:32:55PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:54:55PM -0400, Ruth A. Kramer wrote: > > > Paul Winkler wrote: > > > > +----- gain reduction ------+ > > > > 20 16 12 8 6 4 2 0 > > > > * * * * * * * * > > > > > > I may have this backwards, but, iiuc, higher output is still on the > > > right. If so, it would seem to still meet the standard if expressed as > > > something like "higher levels of output to the right". > > > > that might do. > > > > > (Higher numbers of gain reduction on the left correspond to lower > > > levels of output -- not??) > > > > yep. > > No no no! See how confusing this all is? :-( > As the input signal increases, the gain is reduced more. > So the meter moves to the left. > Passes a threshold. It's displaying the diff between what is and what should never be. > With silent input, there is no gain reduction, so the meter will be all > lit up (i.e. "to the right"). With input up to the threshold. The ratio is what determines the amount of gain reduction applied. You can pin it with 1dB if the ratio is high enough and the threshold low enough. It's showing you how much the gain reduction is pushing back, so being in opposition to how strong you're pushing, it's not unintuitive. Anyway, this is the precedent, so no point in thinking too much about it.
