On 04/08/2016 02:13 AM, jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:58:54 -1000
david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an expensive camera and
having the film developed at the drugstore.
Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty good development from the
drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
good their techs maintain it. ;)
There are no set rules. I remember taking stunningly nice (colours,
feeling, etc...) pictures with a throw-away camera. The actual
cheeziness of the device brought a very nice touch. That was 3
pictures out of the device that were so. The others were crap, but
nevertheless.
So then, the usage of all these fancy electrons mean nothing :)
The good techs probably use optimized bits and carefully-aligned
single-quantum state electrons, too. ;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
