Re: Jack parallelism? Question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On February 24, 2016 08:32:56 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2016 17:37, "Tim E. Real" <termtech@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ie. Clients A B and C are connected in series but we want
> > 
> >  B to operate on A's processed data, and C to operate on B's
> >  processed data, all in one cycle.
> 
> That already happens in series in one cycle. 

So no added latency for series clients? 
OK good. Sorry, my mistake.

I know that hardware ports are another matter, though.

Thanks.
Tim.

> Surely the last thing you want
> if the clients are data dependent is this to happen in parallel?



> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Neil
> 
> Neil C Smith
> Artist : Technologist : Adviser
> http://neilcsmith.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux