On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:28:25 -0800 (PST) Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That doesn't look right. I am not sure that changing this would fix > your problem, but I prefer to have a different RTPRIO for anything > above 50. It has changed since that posting :) RTIRQ_NAME_LIST="snd_ice1712" PID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND 431 FF 90 - 130 1.6 S irq/18-snd_ice1 47 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/9-acpi 77 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/23-ehci_hcd 78 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/23-ehci_hcd 79 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/43-xhci_hcd 80 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/44-xhci_hcd 81 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/45-xhci_hcd 82 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/46-xhci_hcd 83 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/47-xhci_hcd 84 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/48-xhci_hcd 86 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/12-i8042 87 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/1-i8042 88 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/8-rtc0 157 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/50-ahci 170 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/51-i915 420 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/52-mei_me 427 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/53-snd_hda_ 1096 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S irq/49-eth0 [ksoftirqs snipped] I wonder if it makes a difference if the rtc is so low, One of the web pages that was provided here mentions that rtc should be first. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
