On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:36:58 +0000 Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If I understand correctly what you mean, then I must disagree. > The purpose of room correction is to improve your monitoring. > So if it's done well, your monitors plus room plus correction > become the reference. The whole point is that the correction > provides better monitoring, and then there is no reason to > ever switch it off, regard it as 'temporary', or think that > without correction you'd get a better mix. It becomes part > of your studio, and users shouldn't even know it's there. I see. Setting this up would include playing sine waves of various frequencies and detecting room behaviour, so to speak. > Of course you could set up a room correction by manually > tweaking things until you get a more pleasing result on > an existing mix, but by doing that you'd just be fooling > yourself. That's not how it should be done. That's clear. > > Is there a way to calibrate this ? > Use the measurements and procedures as explained in the DRC > manual. You end up with two (for stereo) impulse responses > which can be used by any convolution engine, e.g. jconvolver. Googling this gives 'Digital Room Correction'. There is a sourceforge project: http://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/doc/drc.html Can you briefly describe what DRC consists of and what does the procedure consists of ? _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
