Last Sunday 15 August 2004 18:14, Paul Winkler was like: > "Appalling" is relative. If you've ever been required to get some > html exports from Powerpoint online, you'll have a whole new benchmark > of appallingness ?>8-O > At least with OO.o you have some hope of getting something human-readable > by feeding it through some cleanup scripts. Agreed. I was assuming that no-one in their Right Mind would consider using M$ products, especially not for anything HTML related. There's 'appalling' and there's 'not with a 10m shitty stick'. > But I'm still looking for a good wysiwyg html+css design tool, > and I wouldn't use OO.o for that. And no, bluefish doesn't > do the trick for me either. No Bluefish isn't wysiwyg. So far I have found 'good' and 'wysiwyg' to be mutually exclusive. cheers tim hall
