On Sunday 15 August 2004 12:03 pm, Jack O'Quin wrote: > dee <deetee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > The patches i am using are those from apt-get install > > kernel-patches-debian-2.6.6. --added-patches=debian applies them. (i > > understood) > > > > BUT i don't think my patching is relevant, i only mention it in case > > someone said 'aaah, yes, those debian-patches...bla". as you say below it > > realtime-lsm is a module, and its that that i have a problem with. > > Right. AFAIK, Debian does not distribute the realtime-lsm as a kernel > patch. They did that for the 2.4 low-latency patch, but realtime-lsm > is a separate package. > > > > make-kpkg --append-to-version foo --added-patches=debian > > > > > > Then when thats done, make menuconfig, set up the things you patched > > > for and then 'make-kpkg kernel-image modules-image' > > > > ? i'm not sure this will help, this is essentially what i've done, just > > in one step. am i missing something? > > > > kernel-image makes, but modules-image barfs.... > > > > any further thoughts, or correction in my errant ways welcome... > > I'm confused about what you're doing. Are you trying to build a > kernel? If so, why? Otherwise, why use make-kpkg? > Because it's the Debian way. They have a policy manual for a reason. > > > I have the realtime-lsm debian supplied sources. It's built as a module > > > like ALSA or Nvidia drivers or lmsensors, not a patch to the kernel > > > like say, lowlatency and preempt for 2.4 > > Have you tried compiling the Debian sources for realtime-lsm? j4strngs@araka:~$ ls -l /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.7/ alsa-modules-2.6.7_1.0.5a-1+10.00.Custom_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_i386.deb kernel-source-2.6.7/ nvidia-kernel-2.6.7_1.0.6111-1+10.00.Custom_i386.deb realtime-lsm-module-2.6.7_0.1.1-4+10.00.Custom_i386.deb I'm not running any patches on my 2.6 kernel though.
