I never said such a thing.
I said that no Linux distribution supports the synthesizer I use. I also
said this is 100% unimportant because I have absolute zero interest in
running speech directly from my Linux setup.
what on earth is wrong with that?
Why is my desire to use a machine as I can such an issue with
people providing ideas I never asked for at all, and who are not going
to be using my computer?
I have a full set of Debian squeeze, after another Debian expert, again
leading with
their limited dictionary, sent me a hard drive with a so called
install...excluding any access to the internet whatsoever, and most of
Debian's function.
Help is terrific when it is on topic of what is requested.
i have never in any way shape fashion or form asked anyone on this list to
facilitate my use of speech directly on a Linux box. not at all never not
once.
I have asked more important for me, general questions about Linux and its
music making aspects, because I feel how I accommodate my *personal
experience* is my job...and no one else living unless I am paying them.
After all I am the only personal occupying this body which means I know
better than others what will or will not contribute to my professional
progress.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:26:11 -0500 (EST), Karen Lewellen wrote:
have you any idea how many populations, for various reasons, use
speech synthesizers as apart of their computing?
Like those with dyslexia and other print challenges, autism, other
cognitive disorders, and of course those for whom speech itself is an
issue?
People on this list try to help you, to get your speech synth working
with Linux, since you first mentioned that it only works when using an
old version of Debian. If you dislike to get help with the speech
synth, than it was probably not wise to mention it, especially since
"hardware synth" in the context of an audio mailing list easily could
have been misunderstood as a musical instrument.
Assumed you need help with repairing a car, would you ask a plumber or
an automotive mechatronics engineer for hints how to do it?
If I would like to use a speech synth with Linux I would ask visible
impaired users how to use it, because this user group most likely is
the hugest group using such equipment. Btw. I'm a dyslexic of the type
were words become coloured bars, were characters walk around the paper,
IOW I join the complete mushroom alike experience and never heard of
dyslexic using speech synth and never considered to use one myself.
Anyway, sometimes a plumber knows how to repair a car, but you better
request help from an automotive mechatronics engineer to repair a car.
If you ask for hints what distro to use for audio in combination with
command line, we only can give you help based on the information you
provide, we can't read your mind.
IMO it's not a good idea to remote control an audio workstation, I
would avoid any layer that could have impact to performance. Maybe it's
not an issue to remote control an audio workstation, but usually audio
users don't do it.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:31:58 +0100, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
"commandline friendly" is totally meaningless
No it isn't, depending to the user's needs, the kind of used distro has
impact. If a user e.g. wants to use command line mainly to compile
software that isn't availbale by the repositories for the packages,
then it makes a difference if a user e.g. chose a long term support
release distro or a distro that often provide releases or a rolling
release.
Regards,
Ralf
--
http://www.grundgesetz-gratis.de/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
