On 22/12/15 at 10:56am, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:31:58 +0100, Raffaele Morelli wrote: > >"commandline friendly" is totally meaningless > > No it isn't, depending to the user's needs, the kind of used distro has > impact. If a user e.g. wants to use command line mainly to compile > software that isn't availbale by the repositories for the packages, > then it makes a difference if a user e.g. chose a long term support > release distro or a distro that often provide releases or a rolling > release. > Distro are not "long term release", as the phrase says, releases are long term support or not. Releases and distros have nothing to do with the whole point at all, apples and oranges. Repost can be added and source code is available, if someone can't manage with repos and source code the problem is not the cli he is going to use... but the user itself. You can happily use bash, zsh, korn or whatever shell you like on your distro and compiling has nothing to do with the one you choose. -- «My mama said to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom» _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
